In my book Artemis Fowl, The Opal Deception I could identify the perspective which is 3rd person omniscient, with preppy much every sentence, here’s an example: “Foaly was thinking about buying a new set of wings for the new commanding officer while commander Vinyaya thought ugh, that disgusting centaur.” I don’t think that was very nice from the commander, but I suppose that it is normal to stare in disgust at someone or “something” can’t even go to the bathroom with it being lower than feet level. Sometimes the book is in the 3rd person limited… in some chapters. “Opal flicked her hair to reveal a menacing gaze pin pointing straight towards Merval” This is only a fragment of the sentence, but the rest is run on thoughts. (Very long sentence) The narrator often leads me in the wrong direction, here’s an example: “Opal koboi is the actual criminal in this story…” the description of opal’s crime goes on for 1 chapter but in the next chapter, Artemis makes a crime by selling fairy technology to other humans, which is the most cruel thing that Artemis could have done against the fairy rulebook. The narration lead us into believing that opal koboi is the big criminal in this story, but then “boom” Artemis changes the way the story goes by making the biggest crime ever(In the fairy world). I anticipate that eventually the opal crime will go back into action until the end. This sort of reminds me of the series warriors; in this story the narrator changes character in every chapter. This changes the story’s point of view many times to give us a better understanding, sometimes 2-3 chapters are parallel events, giving us an even better understanding of what’s going on.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire